Legal Question in Appeals and Writs in India

I want to remove the following defects notified by the Hon. Supreme Court of India in my electronically filed WP:
1. COURT FEES IS DEFICIT BY RS. 455/-
2. PAGE NO. AFTER PAGE 49 IS NOT IN CONTINUATION
3. LIST OF DATES IS NOT IN CHRONOLOGICAL ORDER (SEE PAGE1)
4. UNDERLINGING AND HIGHLIGHTED LINES TO BE REMOVED FROM LIST OF DATES, INDEX, PRAYER AND W.P.
5. PAGE 14 TO 20, 40 TO 65, 68,70,76,77,78,81 & 84 ARE TO BE REPLACED
6. AFFIDAVIT TO BE FILED AS PER NW FORMAT (VERIFICATION PARA NOT GIVEN AND DEPONENT SIGNATURE BEFORE VERIFICATION ALSO REQUIRED
7. I.A FOR EXEMPTION FROM OFFICIAL TRANSLATION REQUIRED
8. QUESTION OF LAW AND AVERMENTS TO BE GIVEN IN WRIT PETITION AT PROPER PLACE
9. PETITIONER IN PERSON TO CLARIFY PRIVATE RESPONDENT AT SR. NO. 5 TO 12 OF CAUSE TITLE AND PRAYER OF WRIT PETITION
10. ONLY CONTESTING RESPONDENT TO BE GIVEN IN W.P. AND PRAYER OF W.P.
11. DESCRIPTION OF ANNX P11 NOT PROPER
12. ANNEXURES REFERRED TO IN THE PETITION ARE NOT CERTIFIED AS TRUE COPIES
13. ALL ANNEXURES TO BE MARKED IN THE FACTS OF W.P. WITH PAGE NO. OF ANNEXURES IN WRIT PETITON INSTEAD OF GROUNDS
12. ALL ANNEXURES TO BE CAPTIONED ONLY ONCE (ON THE FIRST PAGE OF ANNEXURES)
13. DATE OF ANNX P7, 11 NOT TALLY
14 ADDRESS OF PETITOINER IN PERSON TO BE REMOVED FROM W.P. (LAST PAGE_
15. PRAYER II AND III OF W.P. ARE INCOMPLETE (DIRECTION GIVEN TO WHOM)
16. PRAYER IV OF W.P. IS NOT SPECIFIC (RELIEF SOUGHT NOT CLEAR)
17. CLARIFY R-2 GIVEN IN LIST OF DATES (PAGE 1 OF LIST OF DATES)
18. TYPE OF WP. NOT GIVEN IN PRAYER OF W.P. AND IF WRIT OF MANDAMUS THAN PARAGRAPH REGARDING APPROACHING CONCERN RESPONDENTS WITH ITS RESULT REQUIRED
19. PAGE NO. OF ALL DOCUMENTS NOT PROPER TO BE GIVEN AS UNDER :
1. LISTING PROFORMA �..............A1,A2
2. LIST OF DATES..........................B,C,D....
3. W.P. WITH AFFIDAVIT..............1,2,3,4....
4. ANNEXURES �............W.P. ONWARDS
20 I.A. FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAR AND ARGUE NOT FILED WITH AFFIDAVIT AND COURT FEES AND ALSO NOT INDICATING THE REASONS AS TO WHY THE PETITIONER CANNOT ENGAGE AN ADVOCATE AND WANTS TO APPEAR AND ARGUE IN PERSON AND IF HE/SHE IS WILLING TO ACCEPT AN ADVOCATE WHO CAN BE APPOINTED FOR HIM/HER BY THE COURT
21. LISTING PROFORMA NOT FILED
22. MEMO OF APPEARANCE HAS NOT BEEN FILED
23. PAGE 79 IS IN VERNACULAR LANGUAGE, ENGLISH TRANSLATION REQUIRED
24. THE PETITION/APPEAL NOT CONTAINS A STATEMENT IN SUPREME COURT RULES AS TO WHETHER THE PETITIONER HAS FILED ANY PETITION EARLIER BEFORE THIS COURT OR ANY OTHER COURT
YOU CAN ALSO SEE THE STATUS/DEFECTS OF YOUR CASE BY VISITING THE FOLLOWING WEBSITE ADDRESS AND ENTERING YOUR DIARY NUMBER HTTP://SUPREMECOURTOFINDIA.NIC.IN FOR BETTER FILING THROUGH 'E-FILING'. YOU CAN SEE THE ATTACHMENT 'E-HELP' FILE.
THE DEFECTS ARE NOTIFIED TO YOU BY E-MAIL ENABLING YOU TO RE-FILE THE PETITION, AFTER CURING THE DEFECTS AS PER SUPREME COURT RULES, 2013 WITHIN 28 DAYS.
IN CASE, THE DEFECTS ARE NOT REMOVED TILL 90 DAYS FROM TODAY, THE MATTER SHALL BE LISTED WITH OFFICE REPORT ON DEFAULT BEFORE THE HON'BLE CHAMBER JUDGE FOR APPROPRIATE ORDERS IN TERMS OF THE PROVISIONS OF PROVISO TO RULE 8 (vii), ORDER III, SUPREME COURT RULES, 2013.
FURTHER CORRESPONDENCE MAY BE MADE IN THIS REGARD WITH THE CONCERNED JUDICIAL SECTION I.E. [email protected]. NO FURTHER CORRESPONDENCE SHALL BE ENTERTAINED BY THE FILING COUNTER WITH REGARD TO THIS MATTER.
(MEENA SARIN)
Dy.Regr.Sec. I-B
Kindly guide me through the process

Asked on 6/18/16, 6:37 am

0 users found helpful

0 attorneys agreed

How do u expect to rectify so many number of queries raised in ur WP without background papers?

U shd consult ur counsel with facts and records and get rectified.

Answered on 6/18/16, 8:25 am

Keywords

Match Any Match All

Country

State

Area of Law