Legal Question in Appeals and Writs in India

Sir we r four landoustees of ntpc dadri. On the basis of ntpc policy that onr member oof every family whose land aquired by ntpc, get permanent job in ntpc. Ntpc engaged us in 1995 on adhoc basis. But after 1.75 yeard thry shiftrd to the contractor. In 1999.a supreme court order have come on the ground of contracte labour that every one who have workwd 240 days in a year, have the right to get permanent job under the company. . Sir we had go to delhi high court and fild a writ on basis of aforesaid ordr. After 2 year there was a another order of sc had come that oppose the contract labour. On the basis of this order high court dismissed our writ. After that we have gone o upreme court with ou slp sYing that we are land oustees we have the right to be regularised. But sc said that as you are seeking regularisation on.the basis of contract labour than high court judgemnt is right. As sc is agree that we are contract labour. But on the basis of landoustes.sc said if you come on the basis of landouste than you can go high court with fresh writ.after that we have gone to al hih court but ald hih court dismised our writ petion. Saying that as sc already saying that you are landoustes and on the basis of landoustees there is no rule of this kind. And ourt is tarah ka order de kar desh ke logon ke saath anyay nahi kar sakti. Now recently a order of madras high court have come giving the right of ger regularised in that company in whih he had worked 480 daya in two years. My question is that kya isme humare liye koi hope hai.? Or agar hai to hum kya kar sakte hai or kahan.? Thanks.
Devendra
Meerut
[email protected]

Asked on 5/27/14, 3:27 am

0 users found helpful

0 attorneys agreed

The issue is very complicated. The whole case file as well as all the orders have to be analysed first.

919555462995

Answered on 5/27/14, 4:52 am

Keywords

Match Any Match All

Country

State

Area of Law