Legal Question in Employment Law in India

need fact, arguments, decision for the following cases:

Chandra Kumar V. Union of India 1997(3) SC 261.


Asked on 2/05/15, 9:56 am

1 Answer from Attorneys

Fca Prashant Chavan Expert Edge LLP

06.02.2015

Dear Sir / Madam.

In the landmark decision of the Supreme Court in L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India (1997) 3 SCC 261 : AIR 1997 SC 1125, it has been held by the Apex Court that the decisions rendered by the Tribunals constituted under Articles 323A and 323B of the Constitution of India would be subject to the writ/supervisory jurisdiction of the High Courts under Article 226/227 of the Constitution within whose territorial jurisdiction the particular Tribunal is functioning, there was virtually no need to continue such Tribunal. It was the case of the respondent-State that in the light of declaration of law in L. Chandra Kumar, Administrative tribunals became "intermediate/additional adjudicatory stratum", "leading to substantial increase in number of pending cases at the level of High Court". Several matters decided by such Tribunals were challenged before High Courts.

Regards,

Read more
Answered on 2/05/15, 11:52 am


Related Questions & Answers

More Labor and Employment Law questions and answers in India