Legal Question in Bankruptcy in California

What is the practical difference between doing a short sale and filing bankruptcy with regard to a person's credit history? What would be the advantage of a short sale, other than not being required to fill out the paperwork and pay the filing fee for bankruptcy?


Asked on 10/02/11, 12:36 pm

2 Answers from Attorneys

Todd Mannis Law Offices of Joseph A. Mannis

Besides the home that obviously has no equity, do you have other debts? If so, I think the bankruptcy would be in your best interests. Get rid of all the debt and get a fresh start.

Besides, if for some reason you still wanted to do a short-sale, you could always do so after the bankruptcy. I'm not sure why you would, because obviously with a short-sale, you're not going to see any proceeds, so the only person who makes out is your realtor. But if you wanted to, you could.

With regard to your credit, I'm not sure that is the most imporant factor to be considered. Some will say a short-sale is better than a foreclosure, which may be true, but I'm guessing your credit is already pretty much gone anyway. If that is the case, getting rid of your debt entirely would seem to be the most important/desirable. Hope that helps.

Todd Mannis, Esq.

Calabasas, California

Tel: (818) 591-9890

www.mannislaw.com

Read more
Answered on 10/02/11, 12:50 pm
Geoff Morris The Morris Law Group

A short sale is less harmful to your credit as compared to bankruptcy.

Read more
Answered on 10/03/11, 9:55 am


Related Questions & Answers

More Bankruptcy Law questions and answers in California