Legal Question in Administrative Law in India
i GOT A JUDGEMENT IN MY FAVOR RELATING TO A RECRUITMENT CASE IN WHICH HON'BLE SUPREME COURT ORDERED TO GIVE ME SENIORITY SINCE 01.09.2003. BUT THE KARNATAKA STATE SAYS THAT THEY WILL FIX THE SENIORITY BUT CANNOT GIVE THE PROMOTION SINCE MINIMUM QUALIFYING SERVICE IS NOT COMPLETED AS PER THE CADRE AND RECRUITMENT RULES. THEREFORE PL. CLARIFY THAT WHETHER I AM ELIGIBLE FOR ALL CONSEQUENTIAL BENIFITS OF SENIORITY INCLUDING PROMOTION OR IT CAN BE DENIED BY SHOWING RECRUITMENT RULES.
Asked on 7/01/16, 10:33 am
1 Answer from Attorneys
1) Without entering into contract thru recruitment, u r not entitled for consequential benefits.
Answered on 7/01/16, 8:56 pm
Related Questions & Answers
-
A government employee, during his service period,decided for second marriage after... Asked 6/29/16, 8:06 am in India Administrative Law
-
Is it obligatory for a government employee to inform his department about the death... Asked 6/29/16, 7:40 am in India Administrative Law
-
Sir mere father ki zamin me unke bhai or chachere bhai ka sath me khata ab hum... Asked 6/27/16, 10:47 am in India Administrative Law
-
I work for state govt in India. I received another appointment from different state... Asked 6/27/16, 5:52 am in India Administrative Law
-
I want to know in which HR rule it is mentioned that if a employee takes a leave in... Asked 6/23/16, 8:21 am in India Administrative Law
Looking for something else?
10,200 active attorneys ready to answer your legal questions today.
Featured Attorneys
Earn additional revenue and grow your business.
