Legal Question in Appeals and Writs in
the right to a faiR TRIAL
How can a boy be found guilty of sexual assault when there is no evidence of where it happened, six different stories of how it happened, no forensic evidence, no witness to any act and when the Magistrate himself said it had been poorly investigated by the police. The magisrate said the boy was guilty because the victums story was believable and she seemed very upset afterwards the incident was meant to have taken place. How can this be a fair trial?.
1 Answer from Attorneys
Re: the right to a faiR TRIAL
The question you ask is not a question that
needs an answer. You've already answered it.
Go to my website at
http://falseallegations.com and then ask your
questions. Your first question should be, Who should I retain as a lawyer?
By the way, what country does NU represent?