Legal Question in Criminal Law in India
dear parshant ji you should say right that we continued existing advocate but from the filing revision in session court he could not appear in court at time , and when date for argument then he come late in court and defance advocate taken date and next date he said that defance advoate say that we should taken date in session court becausee we could not argument start during run midiation in high court between plaintiff and we defandant and accuse in session cort as defandant because they accused sold us properrty through false and forge affidavits base mutated free hold proerrty through sale deed and other legal heirs are file partition suit and chellange registered will in high court but not complainnt for false affidavit in criminal court so we herrase both side and i talk to another advocate then he file section 340 in high court . is it right way or not?
2 Answers from Attorneys
Relationship of client and attorney is of mutual respect.
Your lawyer can guide you better whether 340 required or not and you may cross check with other lawyers by letting them conduct legal research.
Related Questions & Answers
-
IF A PERSON APPOINTED AS A MACHINISHT IN A CENTRAL GOVERNMENT AND AFTER THAT HE HAS... Asked 6/26/13, 1:41 am in India Criminal Law
-
Myself I am a railway employee working near Mumbai. Legal assistance required... Asked 6/25/13, 11:21 am in India Criminal Law
-
What evidentiary value of chief examination of witness without cross examination of... Asked 6/25/13, 9:53 am in India Criminal Law
-
Can we get anticipatory bail in 138 of cheque bouncing in delhi and utter pradesh Asked 6/25/13, 5:41 am in India Criminal Law
-
Can interim bail be converted into regular bail.? Is it necessary for accused to... Asked 6/24/13, 11:57 am in India Criminal Law