Legal Question in Criminal Law in India
PRINCIPLE: According to the doctrine of vicarious liability, a person shall be liable for the damage caused by his employee in the course of employment.
A is a big trader in sweets and he appointed X as his agent to procure sweets from the sweet factories in a particular region. Normally, used to collect sweets from the factories and the payments would be made within a month. This arrangement was going on for sometime. There arose some problems between A and X and A terminated X's employment. X continued to procure sweets even thereafter and he disappeared with the sweeta so procured. The sweet manufacturers filed a suit against A claiming payment?
1) A is not liable to pay since X was not in his employment at the relevant period of time
. 2) A is liable, since the sweet manufacturers did not have reason to disbelieve X and had handed the sweets to him.
3) A is liable, since he failed to check X from posing himself as the agent of A.
4) None of the above.
please explain the reason also..
1 Answer from Attorneys
this is a students query and not a clients. please do some hard work it will help you in the long run. good luck.
Related Questions & Answers
-
A case has been admitted against me n three others u/s 420,406 filed through court... Asked 12/13/13, 3:57 am in India Criminal Law
-
An agreement to sell was made in year 1997 for mortgage of a plot, in lieu of Rs. 2... Asked 12/13/13, 3:20 am in India Criminal Law
-
If somebody has filed criminal proceedings in sec138 and has also started... Asked 12/11/13, 7:07 pm in India Criminal Law
-
If somebody has filed criminal proceedings in sec138 and has also started... Asked 12/11/13, 7:05 pm in India Criminal Law