Legal Question in Credit and Debt Law in Arizona
I was served with a summons from an attorney of a debt buyer for an old credit card debt. I am planning on filing a motion to dismiss as I was not provided with a copy of the original contract as well as the statute of limitations (3 years) has run out. If file the motion with the court and provide a copy to the plantiff's attorney does that suffice until a determination to dismiss has been made, or do I still need to file an answer within the 20 days as well?
1 Answer from Attorneys
If you are representing yourself, you are responsible for knowing the Rules of Court. You should review the Arizona Rules of Court which can be located on line if you google it. Without reading the complaint, it would be inappropriate to provide you with opinions regarding the viability of your Motion to Dismiss. Generally speaking, the original contract does not have to include the original contract as an exhibit to the Complaint. Most credit card companies give an affidavit to the attorney which is attached to the complaint and incorporated therein. This is a notice pleading jurisdiction. If the complaint alleges that an assignment of the contract occurred between the plaintiff and the original credit card company, that may be sufficient. Credit card debt is analyzed under two different statutes... a contract statute which is six years on a statute of limitations defense and a credit card which is 3 years from the last payment date. A motion to Dismiss is treated as an initial appearance, if it is denied, you still have to answer the lawsuit... most attorneys would file an answer followed by a Motion to Dismiss or Motion for Summary Judgment.