Legal Question in Criminal Law in Arizona
The Benefit of Attorney Client Privilege
Do the benefits that the Attorney Client Privilege provides outweight the harms that it causes in obstructing the surfacing of evidence in the court of law? Is confidentiality really important and essential between the lawyer and the client? In other words, would chilling be a major effect? Is the right to the privilege guaranteed in the 5th and 6th Amendments? Finally, does privilege on the prosecutors side prevent exculpatory evidence from surfacing that might prove the innocence of the defendant? Thank for your time in answering, I realize this is very much theory rather than a pragmatic situation, and yet I feel these are important issues that I need a second opinion on.
1 Answer from Attorneys
Re: The Benefit of Attorney Client Privilege
More of a philosophical issue than a direct question. Nonetheless, my opinion is that atty client privilege is vital and does not chill constitutional rights. Insofar as prosecutors are concerned, they have an absolute duty to disclose any and mitigating, exculpatory, or impeachment evidence. Look at Brady v. MD, and U.S. v. Bagley. Both are US Sup. Ct. cases.
Related Questions & Answers
-
Possession charges My son has been charged with possession of marijauana and... Asked 9/29/03, 1:48 pm in United States Arizona Criminal Law
-
Accuracy of Breathalizer How accurate are breathalizer tests and are are they... Asked 9/10/03, 6:03 pm in United States Arizona Criminal Law
-
Prop 200 third time probation violations i am a prop 200 case. i have violated... Asked 8/20/03, 11:18 am in United States Arizona Criminal Law
-
Embezellment My wife is in prison due to depositing checks from her employer to pay... Asked 8/15/03, 10:53 pm in United States Arizona Criminal Law