Legal Question in Criminal Law in Arizona
Pleading guilty: Conviction or not?
I need assistance understanding the definition of 'conviction'.
I was charged with one count of DV-Disorderly Conduct, a class 1 misdemeanor. If I plead guilty when I make my first appearance in court, will my records list the verdict as a conviction? Or do I have to go through a hearing/trial AND be found guilty to be listed as convicted?
My main concern is that as a firearms owner, one of the requirements to own/purchase a firearm is to NOT be convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence. My firearms were confiscated at the time of the incident, and I just would like to know if a guilty plea would bar me from ever owning a firearm again. The sheriff who confiscated my firearms told me who I have to contact(Head of DV dept.) to get them back, but he did not mention anything about how the charge affects my privilage to own.
I have read over A.R.S. 13-3601 and it does state that I must wait a min of 72 hours before I may request them back, but I am more concerned about what may happen after the premilinary hearing/first appearance. I don't know if this makes a difference, but I was the victim in the incident.
Thank you for all your help!
1 Answer from Attorneys
Re: Pleading guilty: Conviction or not?
To answer your first question, yes, if you plead guilty, that will be a conviction just the same as if you were found guilty by a jury or a judge, it makes no difference. Now, to answer your second question about how to get your guns back: Pursuant to the Lautenberg Amendment to the Gun Control Act of 1968, effective 30 September 1996, it is a felony for those convicted of certain misdemeanor crimes of domestic violence to own or possess firearms or ammunition. That means that if you have a conviction for a qualifying offense, it is a felony under federal law to possess a firearm. The only way around it is to get an expungement (after conviction get it taken out of the public records). Now, under the Lautenberg Amendment, the underlying offense must include an element requiring proof of the use or attempted use of physical force or the threatened use of a deadly weapon against the victim. So, I don't know the facts, but if the DV charge is just a disturbance of the peace (arguing) and there was no physical contact or threatened physical contact, then it shouldn't qualify. Now, under Arizona law, the judge can place an order of protection, and as part of the order take your firearms and not allow you to possess them for the duration of the order. Additionally, if you are placed on probation for the offense, a condition may be that you are not allowed to possess the firearms.
As for the charge itself, my advice is always to not plead guilty unless you have to. If you want to look at retaining a private attorney to review the evidence and fight it, or if the evidence is heavily against you, work with the prosecutor to get a plea agreement, e-mail me [email protected]. My fees are very reasonable, and as a former Marine JAG senior defense counsel, I handled a lot of these cases (you can't have a Marine you can't possess a weapon!). You can also check out my website www.win-law.com, where I have a section on domestic violence.
Related Questions & Answers
-
Lawyer-client relationship Judge Montiel represented Conchola (Supt.of... Asked 7/01/06, 1:59 am in United States Arizona Criminal Law
-
What do I need to do about my warrant January of this year I was arrested in Tucson,... Asked 6/28/06, 10:48 am in United States Arizona Criminal Law