Legal Question in Administrative Law in California

IXV. CASE "LAW" IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL:

As CASE "LAW" IS ENACTED BY THE JUDICIAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT.

When a lawyer-judge instructs, directs, or gives orders to a jury, the lawyer-judge is TAMPERING WITH THE JURY. He also tampers with testimony when he orders the answers to be either "yes" or "No." The lawyer --judge also tampers, fixes, and rigs the trial when he orders anything stricken from the record, or when he "rules" certain evidence and the truth to be inadmissable. This makes the trial and transcript FIXED and RIGGED, because the jury does not hear the REAL TRUTH and ALL THE FACTS. Juries are made into puppets by the lawyers and lawyer-judges.

All lawyers are automatically in the judicial branch of government, as they have the Unconstitutional TITLE OF NOBILITY (Article 1, Section 9 and 10), "Officer of the court."

Citizens have to be elected or hired to be in any branch of government but non-lawyer Citizens are limited to only 2 of the 3 branches of government. Lawyers as 1st class citizens, can be hired or elected to any of the three branches of government. Lawyers, "Officers of the Court," in the Judicial Branch, are Unconstitutionally in 2 branches of government AT THE SAME TIME whenever they are hired or elected to the executive or legislative branches. This is a violation of the separation of powers, checks and balances, and the conflict of interest laws.

District attorneys and State's attorneys have taken over the Grand Juries FROM the people, where the people are DENIED ACCESS to the grand juries when they attempt to present evidence of crimes committed in the courtrooms by the lawyers and lawyer-judges. TRY TAKING THIS MATERIAL TO THE GRAND JURIES!

The U.S. Constitution, being the Supreme Fundamental Law, is not and CANNOT be ambiguous as to be interpreted, or it would be a worthless piece of paper and we would have millions of interpretations (Unconstitutional amendments) instead of the few we have now. That is why all judges and public servants are SWORN TO SUPPORT the U.S. Constitution, NOT interpret it.

ATTORNEY'S LICENSE ??? AIN'T NO SUCH THING!!!

I. AS PER THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT;

A. The practice of Law CAN NOT be licensed by any state/State Schware v. Board of Examiners, 353 U.S. 238, 239

B. The practice of Law is AN OCCUPATION OF COMMON RIGHT!

Sims v. Aherns, 271 S.W. 720 (1925)

II. The "CERTIFICATE" from the State Supreme Court:

1. ONLY authorizes,

A. To practice Law "IN COURTS" As a member of the STATE JUDICIAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT.

B. Can ONLY represent WARDS OF THE COURT.

2. INFANTS

3. PERSONS OF UNSOUND MIND SEE CORPUS JURIS SECUNDUM, VOLUME 7, SECTION 4.

4. A. "CERTIFICATE" IS NOT A LICENSE....

A. To practice Law AS AN OCCUPATION.

B. Nor to DO BUSINESS AS A LAW FIRM!!!

III. The "STATE BAR" CARD IS NOT A LICENSE!!!

A. It is a "UNION DUES CARD"

B. The "BAR" is a "PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION."

1. Like the Actors Union, Painters Union, etc.

2. No other association, EVEN DOCTORS, issue their own license. ALL ARE ISSUED BY THE STATE.

C. It is a NON-GOVERNMENTAL PRIVATE ASSOCIATION.

1. See Attorney General Dan Morales' letter.

2. As per this letter; the State does not issue licenses and they are not issued by his office!

IV. The State Bar is;

A. An Unconstitutional Monopoly, Article 1, Section 26, Texas Bill of Rights.

B. A ILLEGAL & CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE;

C. Violates Article 2, Section 1, Separation of Powers clause of the Constitution.

D. There is NO POWER OR AUTHORITY for joining of Legislative, Judicial, or Executive as the BAR and SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS are doing. ALL MEMBERS OF BOTH ARE MONOPOLISTIC BAR MEMBERS!

E. In violation of the RIGHT TO WORK LAWS of Texas.

V. State Bar Rules. . . at Article III, Section 2. . .

Enrollment in the State Bar: "Each person who becomes licensed to practice law is REQUIRED TO ENROLL IN THE STATE BAR WITHIN 10 DAYS "BEFORE" OR "AFTER" RECEIVING A LICENSE TO PRACTICE LAW.

ENROLLMENT IN THE BAR AND LICENSE ARE NOT THE SAME. THE BAR CAN NOT LICENSE ANYONE!!!!!

1 Answer from Attorneys

Related Questions & Answers

More Administrative Law questions and answers in California

Looking for something else?