Legal Question in Administrative Law in California
who is the survivor
In a will it states:
If such person leaves no survivors, or should not survive distribution of my estate, such gift shall be distributed as part of the residue of my estate.
This person named in the will is dead (father).
He was married and had 2 sons.
The two sons are named in the will as benficiaries.
Who is considered the survivor(s)?
Who should get the share of the (father)?
1. The wife, becuause she was married to the person named in the will.
2. The sons, even though they are named in the will.
3. The money should be distributed as part of the residue of my estate.
1 Answer from Attorneys
Re: who is the survivor
This has the smell of a law school exam question, and we aren't supposed to answer such questions on LawGuru. Also, the question deals with wills and estates, not administrative law, which is the branch of law that deals with the operations of administrative agencies such as the public utilities commission and the zoning authority. Nevertheless, I'll take a shot at answering:
First, without the full text of the will, the term 'survivor' is potentially ambiguous, but it would probably be construed to mean 'living descendant' or 'living descendant of his body' (a blood descendant). So, the father's share would be distributed to the sons.
The fact that the father was married does not entitle the wife to a share; the father became unmarried when he died, and until the testator is also dead, the father had a 'mere' expectancy and not an interest in which his then wife might share.
The money does not fall into the residue category under any of the facts given.
If this is a real-life legal issue, it should be directed to an attorney who does wills and trusts for verification that my answer is correct after a chance to read the entire will.
Related Questions & Answers
-
PETTY THEFT Exspungment Is it possible to get a pett theft record exspunged? Asked 3/31/05, 10:44 pm in United States California Administrative Law