Legal Question in Bankruptcy in California

Hi,

I had filed a Chapter 13 bankruptcy, which was my second one within a 12-month period. Without obtaining a Relief from Stay order from the bankruptcy court, the opposing attorney at my Unlawful Detainer eviction hearing used the "No automatic stay after 30-days" bankruptcy law (For a 2nd bankruptcy filing within a 12-month period) in order to get the judge to render a judgment (And issue a writ of possession) against me, ALTHOUGH there is a "grey area" here, in that the opposing attorney also may NEED to get an order from the bankruptcy court for Relief from the Automatic Stay, simply because my HOME is at issue here (A "real property interest"), instead of an apartment rental, and the real property in question is, technically, now in the possession of the bankruptcy trustee, which may technically require a "Relief from Stay" order before the plaintiff can proceed against me.

At any rate, before I could move Ex-Parte to bring this fact to the judge's attention, in order to be able to set aside (Or vacate) the judgment against me, I received a Notice to Vacate, thereby not giving me enough time to move Ex-Parte before the lockout.

SO ! The plot now thickens:

I then immediately filed for an EMERGENCY bankruptcy 30-day stay, depositing one month's mortgage payment money (Or "rental" money) with the bankruptcy court as required (This was done with my existing bankruptcy -- I.e., the 2nd BK filing within the 12-month period), and the sheriff's office scheduled for the lockout received the paperwork and said that "Absolutely, this will stop the eviction, and that I now have 30-days time due to the emergency bankruptcy stay" BECAUSE one-month's mortgage / rental amount had now been deposited with the bankruptcy court.

Then, WITHOUT RETURNING MY DEPOSIT MONEY THAT WAS DEPOSITED WITH THE BANKRUPTCY COURT, and which the bankruptcy court clerk also sent directly to the landlord (Wells Fargo home mortgage, att their corporate address in San Francisco), the opposing attorney called the sheriff's office and told the sheriff supervisor to proceed against me with the lockout (After only 3 days), because my bankruptcy "automatic stay" for my "2nd-time in 12-month BK filing was long ago over", and there was now NO automatic stay to prevent me from being locked out, whereby the attorney completely ignored the fact that the bankruptcy court had already impletmented the 30-day EMERGENCY DEPOSIT MONEY stay by taking my (Monthly mortgage amount) deposit money for the new, upcoming 30-day period ( $2,200 ! ) , and the opposing attorney also had made NO arrangements or effort whatsoever to even have this LAWFUL 30-DAY EMERGENCY STAY MONEY returned to me !

Please help ! Can you advise and quote to me (And give me an internet link, etc.) any applicable federal bankruptcy law that will be favorable to my position so that I can overturn this lockout (Ex-Parte hearing) and receive the remainder of my 30-day term that was already confirmed (And paid for) with the bankruptcy court ? My entire life is now locked up in my house, and I have no where else to move to, as the "landlord / mortgage company" now has my $2,200 that, otherwise, I needed to find another place !

Thank you very much.

Jim F.


Asked on 10/28/11, 11:00 am

1 Answer from Attorneys



Related Questions & Answers

More Bankruptcy Law questions and answers in California