Legal Question in Bankruptcy in California

The Supreme Court ruling on IRAs in bankruptcy

Does the Supreme Court ruling of 4 April, 2005 in the case of Rousey v Jacoway (03-1407) holding that their IRA assets could not be seized by the trustee of the bankruptcy apply to all IRA accounts? If the ruling applies to all IRAs, when does it become effective?


Asked on 5/05/05, 8:55 pm

2 Answers from Attorneys

Mark Markus Law Office of Mark J. Markus

Re: The Supreme Court ruling on IRAs in bankruptcy

It applies to all IRAs that meet the IRS requirements, which I believe they all do. However, the holding, in my opinion, was NOT that IRA assets could not be seized by a Trustee. To the contrary, the holding was merely that IRAs MAY be exempted under the exemption that provides for retirement accounts which, in California, is the amount reasonably necessary for the debtor's future maintenance and support.

Read more
Answered on 5/05/05, 9:34 pm
Robert F. Cohen Law Office of Robert F. Cohen

Re: The Supreme Court ruling on IRAs in bankruptcy

Yes, previously there was a distinction between company-provided accounts and IRAs in some BK trustees' minds because of liquidity issues. However, the Supreme Court held that even though it may be easier to access, the intent is still for retirement, especially since there's a severe penalty if withdrawn early. In CA, IRAs are exempt in the amount that's reasonable and necessary for retirement. For instance, if you are 22, file bankruptcy and have some big bucks in an IRA, it's more likely to be seized than that of a debtor who is 64 years old.

Read more
Answered on 5/06/05, 12:02 am


Related Questions & Answers

More Bankruptcy Law questions and answers in California