Legal Question in Business Law in California

Authorized vs unauthorized dealer internet sales

We sell products through the internet website. For one of our lines we obtain products from a domestic factory-authorized dealer, mark them up and offer for sale. The factory does not permit its own dealers to sell products over the internet, relying instead on the dealer network throughout the country. We are not authorized dealers and don't intend to become one. We clearly state on our website that 'we are not authorized dealers' for this line. People go for the better prices anyway. The factory (they are HQ'ed in Asia with an office in California) accuses us of misrepresentation and deception (authorized vs. unauthorized dealer sales) and threatens a lawsuit. Do they have a case here? And just make it more interesting - we found overseas suppliers of the same product and plan to sell it to international customers, w/o ever bringing it here. Can they stop us?


Asked on 12/03/02, 10:35 am

2 Answers from Attorneys

Michael Paradise Law Offices of Michael S. Paradise

Re: Authorized vs unauthorized dealer internet sales

For most kinds of goods, under the first sale doctrine, called various things (e.g. restraint on alienation), the seller cannot control resales so long as it is clearly disclosed that the dealer is not an authorized dealer. However, some foreign jurisdictions nominally allow such restraints for some types of goods, and sometimes the warranty can be voided (although some states do not allow the warranty to be affected). I would need more information about the type of goods you are selling and the proposed foreign jurisdictions of sale.

Also, a practical concern can be litigation cost. Even if you are right on the law, a large manufacturer will sometimes sue anyway for in terrorem effect. Does the manufacturer have a history of litigation against "gray market" dealers?

Good luck. If I can be of further service, please contact me.

Read more
Answered on 12/03/02, 11:44 am
Bryan Whipple Bryan R. R. Whipple, Attorney at Law

Re: Authorized vs unauthorized dealer internet sales

The manufacturer's claims against you seem to be based upon copyright and trademark law. First-sale doctrine may protect you as to the merchandise itself, but associated literature, logos, sales material, etc. might still be subject to the owner's control. If so, disclosure that you're not an authorized reseller may not be enough -- it would be like a bank robber admitting to the teller that he didn't have an account there.

These gray-market and unauthorized distribution resales have been litigated a lot in the last ten years or so, and there is a body of case law precedent that can be applied to your facts to determine what, if anything, the manufacturer can enjoin in your situation. The resellers have won a fair number of these cases based upon the preference for free trade and competition, but in some cases the manufacturers have prevailed, at least on some issues and practices.

The probable outcome in court is very fact-specific and you would need to go over your entire selling operation with an intellectual-property attorney in order to get a halfway reliable red, yellow or green light on various aspects of your business.

Read more
Answered on 12/03/02, 3:09 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More Business Law questions and answers in California