Legal Question in Business Law in California

I've built a small residential rental business over the years. I build as well, G.C. I want to incorporate my business (C form) and to issue Section 1244 Stock in case I experience any losses in the future.

While reading Nolo Press's "Tax Savvy for Small Business", page 142, bullet 2: "No more then 50% of the corporation's gross receipts during the preceeding five years may have been passive income. Passive income includes royalties, dividends, intgerest, rents, annuitites... Sectio 1244 corporation losses must be from active business operations, not investments."

As my revenvues are derived from "rents," from which I pay myself a salary, would this inhibit incorporating my business and issuing Section 1244 Stock? I work everyday and I don't consider my income to be passive.

Thanks so much for your help. JB


Asked on 5/27/10, 1:10 pm

4 Answers from Attorneys

I'm not sure you're doing the right thing here. Yes, you should incorporate, although your situation may require some more complex planning than what you've indicated. Typically you would want to separate out "active" operations such as contracting with assets such as rental properties. You're right to want to do something, it's dangerous to hold those types of assets in an individual capacity, and there's likely tax savings you're missing, and liabilities you are exposed to. The Section 1244 stock applies upon the sale of the stock -- unless you're specifically planning a sale of the business down the line (as opposed to sales of properties), you're probably looking at a red herring.

There are also significant tax consequences of having a C versus S corporation. And, you are betting off holding real property in an LLC.

You need to talk to a business lawyer about the details of your situation.

Read more
Answered on 5/27/10, 4:25 pm
Ronald Cappuccio Ronald J. Cappuccio, J.D., LL.M.(Tax)

If you were not in California, I would advise you to form a Limited Liability Company. This would allow the deductions to pass through to you on your 1040. In fact, it sounds like you have at least two separate businesses. The first is a general contractor. The second is rental real estate. I would definitely keep the businesses separate to limit cross-liability.

For tax purposes, I would try to have you classified as a real estate professional so you could get advantage of the losses.

You need to talk to a tax lawyer right away.

I hope this helps!

Ron Cappuccio

856 665-2121

www,TaxEsq.com

Read more
Answered on 5/27/10, 5:03 pm
Bryan Whipple Bryan R. R. Whipple, Attorney at Law

I am NOT a tax expert nor do I give clients tax advice per se. However, I know just enough about the subject to have a suggestion. Don't assume that your income from your rental properties is necessarily passive. I think there is at least some possibility that the IRS would treat your rental-business income as active, rather than passive, because of the degree that you manage and participate in the business. Don't take this for 100% certain, but on the other hand, don't get discouraged about your project until you inquire!

Read more
Answered on 5/27/10, 5:06 pm
Kevin B. Murphy Franchise Foundations, APC

As the other attorneys say, this is a complicated situation. Passive income is defined to include "rents." However, if you are actively managing the properties, paying for improvements, repairs, etc., this may provide what is needed. Best to consult with a tax attorney in your area for specific advice before taking any step.

Kevin B. Murphy, B.S., M.B.A., J.D. - Mr. Franchise

Franchise Attorney

Kevin B. Murphy, B.S., M.B.A., J.D. - Mr. Franchise

Franchise Attorney

Read more
Answered on 5/28/10, 8:36 am


Related Questions & Answers

More Business Law questions and answers in California