Legal Question in Business Law in California
I was discussing a business idea and forming a company with an acquaintance, we agreed that we would be pursuing this idea together and met several times, including meeting with outside sources and created several verbal agreements. He disappeared for a month, (his business requires him to travel) and though I tried to reach him several times, he did not answer. I recieved an e-mail from his for a "team"meeting and him being the founder of this idea. He came to meet with me to discuss what percentages we would take of the future company and he wanted to take 51% and I would take whatever would be left over. At the meeting he claimed himself the founder and after I tried to mention to him that he is not the founder and I want recognition as co-founder he completely disapeared and has never returned my phone calls. Do I have legal right to pursue him if he actually created this business, even though it was mine to start with? I have documented e-mails, phone records and text messages showing that I was a part of this from the beginning as well as several witnesses.
5 Answers from Attorneys
You may have a claim. Oral agreements are enforceable, but can create issues regarding credibility and proof. Here you claim that there is a document trail through e-mail to support your claims. The bigger issue will be damages. What is preventing you from pursuing the business opportunity? Is there any reasonable likelihood that the business will get off the ground and be profitable? You would need to meet with an attorney to discuss your claims and your proof in greater detail for an attorney to really be able to evaluate your claims.
I would start with a HIDES document which includes the History, Issues, Documents, Evidence and recommend Solutions. In creating the HIDES document you will be marshalling the facts to support your claim in the event that you need to hire an attorney and/or seek to persuade him to understand your requests.
By Grace...
Shawn Jackson ESQ. (707) 584-4529
Business Development Attorney
No communication resulting herein shall create an attorney-client relationship unless a separate retainer agreement is signed by attorney and client. The information provided neither is not legal advice nor is it conveyed in the course of an attorney-client relationship, but is intended merely as a general overview with regard to the subject matter covered. You should not act upon this information without seeking professional counsel such as any attorney in this office in a subsequent email communication (agreement) and the formation of an attorney client relationship.
EMAIL: [email protected]
www.CaliforniaBusinessDevelopmentAttorneys.com
www.CaliforniaBusinessDevelopmentCenter.com
www.CaliforniaBusinessDevelopmentPlans.com
You are a poster child for why you must have non-disclosure and non-compete agreements in place before sharing ideas with other people. Didn't you see the movie Social Network? Seriously, though, you can't patent or trademark or copyright an idea. You may have a case if you were induced to delay and prevented from going forward with your idea because he lied to you that he was going to work with you (this was the basis of the Winklevoss twins' case against Zuckerberg over Facebook). If you actually shared proprietary trade secret information or other recognized intellectual property with this guy and he took it to start his own business you may have a case. (The Winklevosses lost on this issue because they had nothing but an idea; Zuckerberg and his team wrote all their own programming and design work). Or, if you invested money in the business and were defrauded out of it, or out of an agreed share, you would have a case (this was the basis of Edwardo Savarin's action against Zuckerberg). But if all he did was take an idea of yours and run with it, all you can do is work with him to reach mutually acceptable terms, or take the idea and go into competition with him (after consulting with an attorney about protecting yourself this time).
You can sue for just about anything; the practical issues will be proof of facts and damages. My hunch is that proving recoverable damages will be more difficult than proving the facts as stated.
One thing that is for sure is that you're lucky you didn't accept the 51-49 deal. You'd have been miserable and lost a lot more money.
I'd suggest starting the proposed business anyway, by yourself, or with reputable associates. You could also file suit, but I think its main advantage to you would be to deliver a kick in the rear rather than win you a big damages award.
As a Franchise Attorney I agree with the other attorney answers. You could have sued him for possibly misappropriating your "idea" if you had him sign a nondisclosure agreement right at the beginning. Now, you've essentially given away your idea for free. Consult with a good business or franchise attorney in your area for specific advice.
Mr. Franchise - Kevin B. Murphy, B.S., M.B.A., J.D.
Franchise Foundations, a Professional Corporation
Related Questions & Answers
-
What is Venue and what is the effect of filing a case with improper venue? Asked 6/27/11, 4:10 pm in United States California Business Law
-
I bought a gas station soon my escrow close i went to city hall to get buissness... Asked 6/26/11, 10:39 pm in United States California Business Law