Legal Question in Business Law in California
Fraud: property damage claims with self insureds
Large firms, municipalities and utilities are
allowed to be "self-insured" exempt from state
insurance code by posting bond with DMV.No govt.
agency has oversight over their claims practices.
Have suffered over $25M in property damages; "bad
guys" offer only $4800 contigent on final
settlement of personal injury. Know of anyone who
has successfully litigated intentional fraud CACC
1709, 1711,1668 or 3294.c? Federal RICO "pattern
and practice? Have media interes
1 Answer from Attorneys
Re: Fraud: property claims with self insureds
Something doesn't make sense here -- do you mean $25 million or $25 thousand? People who have $25 million worth of property to damage usually already have lawyers to answer their questions.
Assuming the correct amount is $25 thousand, how do you come to this figure? You also refer to "personal injury," which is different from property damage. More details would be very helpful here.
It really doesn't matter much how the defendant is insured as long as they can come up with the money to satisfy any judgment you obtain against them. Your main concern at this point probably should be on proving your damages rather than worrying about their insurance.