Legal Question in Business Law in California
Mechanic's lien on a property
A carpet Company installs damaged carpets in my property. After negotiations he agreed to reduce the price. After being paid on the agreed price he filed a mechanic's lien for the balance of the money. The job was done on 10/28/98 and he filed the lien on 8/12/99 without going to court. He sent me a 20 day notice on 3/12/99. I had to pay him through escrow since I wanted to refinance the property.
Did he file the lien correctly?
can I sue him in small claims court to get the lien money back?
What reasons I can give at court to win this case?
Thank you.
2 Answers from Attorneys
Re: Mechanic's lien on a property
It sounds to me like there may be a timing issue because the lien was filed so late, or a breach of contract issue if you agreed to a settlement, you paid the agreed amount, and then he filed the lien anyway. One resource you can look at is California Mechanic's Lien Law, which your local library should have (if not, they will likely have something similar). There you should find a checklist of steps for a valid mechanic's lien. In the alternative, if the amount involved justifies the cost, you should seek legal counsel. Mechanic's lien law is complicated even for experienced lawyers.
Re: Mechanic's lien on a property
This is another sterling example of why you should
consult with an attorney before you pay the money,
rather than waiting until after it's paid to try
to get it back. The contractor in this case did
everything wrong:
1. The 20-day notice, if it was required at all (it is not required of a primse contractor, only of a subcontractor), must be served within 20 days of the commencement of the work. If served later, then only work performed back to 20 days before its service may be secured by the mechanics lien. In this case, the 20-day notice was served months after the work was performed.
2. The mechanics lien must be filed within 90 days of the completion of the work. In this case, it was many months late.
3. Of course, the mechanics lien was improper in the first place, because the contractor was paid in full according to the agreement with the owner.
4. Instead of paying the improper mechanics lien, the owner should have filed an action to expunge it. There is a summary action to eliminate such liens, and the contractor even has to pay the owner's attorney's fees for doing so.
Related Questions & Answers
-
"Church Constitution & Bylaws" Our church has recently amended their... Asked 1/26/00, 7:24 pm in United States California Business Law