Legal Question in Business Law in California
Pre Employment Agreement
My employer made me sign an agreement prior to working stating that I will not work for another recruiting firm for 6 months after leaving. It states that I can not contact any companies that I recruited for while working for him either. The situation is that I would like to start my own recruiting company. Is it possible for him to sue me if I do and does an agreement such as this hold up in the state of California? Thanks.
3 Answers from Attorneys
Re: Pre Employment Agreement
The provision about not working for another recruiting firm is probably not enforceable. It would run afoul of Business and Professions Code Section 16600 that declares any contract which restrains someone from engaging in any lawful business, trade or occupation to be against public policy and therefore void to the extent of the restriction.
Parallel to this, seemingly in conflict, but generally distinguishable by a careful reading of the cases in this area, is the policy (and statutes) prohibiting the misappropriation of trade secrets. A list of clientele of a temp agency can be a trade secret, so that if a former employee of temp agency 1 leaves and goes to work for, or starts, temp agency 2, and uses her old boss's snitched Rolodex (or the modern equivalent, a computer file), this is probably an illegal misappropriation.
How do you draw the line, or figure out the difference, between fair going-into-competition, on the one hand, and illegal trade-secret snatching, on the other? Well, this is why lawyers go to law school and have those enormous libraries. The answers are maybe in there - or maybe we have to compare prior cases, existing statutes and situation-specific facts and render an opinion, with the ever-present qualifications, as to whether the proposed new business is safe or risky.
As to whether you can be sued - this question always breaks down into two sub-questions. The answer to the basic question as to whether you can be sued is "Probably, yes." All it takes is the filing fee and a willingness to dictate a complaint to an equally eager lawyer. The second question is "Will the plaintiff win?" Without knowing more specifics, I'd say this is a 50-50 proposition. Narrowing down the odds requires the aforementioned research and application of wisdom.
In your favor, I'd say California has a pretty strong preference for letting former employees compete. Against you, the opportunity to misappropriate trade secrets in employment-agency cases seems higher than in many other industries.
Re: Pre Employment Agreement
There are limitations on noncompete agreements, but I would have to look at details.
Best,
Daniel Bakondi, Esq.
IMPORTANT:
No attorney-client nor confidential relationship is created through this communication. You may not rely in any way on this communication, and nothing herein constitutes legal advice nor legal opinion. Your issue may be time sensitive and may result in loss of rights if you do not obtain an attorney immediately.
Re: Pre Employment Agreement
There are several issues involved with your question that relate to non-compete agreements, trade secrets, customer lists, etc.
I think you need to have a consultation with a local attorney to discuss you options as you risk a lawsuit if you are not aware of your rights AND obligations.
DISCLAIMER
This reply constitutes legal information for education purposes and does NOT constitute legal advice nor establish an attorney-client relationship. We will only represent you based on a written retainer agreement. Therefore, you should contact this office to discuss representation if you do want legal advice/representation.
Related Questions & Answers
-
Various Short Questions 1. Is it illegal to maintain an employee status (as a... Asked 2/26/09, 1:00 pm in United States California Business Law
-
Refund can i still get a refund after 2002 if I just found out my credits for my... Asked 2/26/09, 10:36 am in United States California Business Law