Legal Question in Business Law in California
I have a provision in my employment agreement stating that I cannot provide assistance or services to a competitor for 9 months. I am a California resident that works from home for the entire employment relationship and am paid in California. I work for a company based in Minnasota that is incorporated in Delaware. I want to work for a competitor again in which I will work from home, but for a company based in North Carolina. I don't want to violate the non-competition clause in my employment agreement, but have read that non-competition clauses are non-enforceable in California. Is this non-compete enforceable?
3 Answers from Attorneys
Such provisions are not enforceable in CALIFORNIA, as against a strong California public policy, i.e. its Constitution. If it were to be enforced in Minnesota (difficult, since you reside here) if your employment contract states Minnesota law will apply, it could be a different result. Almost all states, other than California, do not outright prohibit noncompetition provisions. In any event you cannot use confidential information gained from your prior employment in a new employment.
I agree. The non-compete clause cannot be enforced in California, except to the extent you misappropriate confidential information (which, I suppose, could happen), but the clause is likely enforceable if the employer is able to bring the suit in some other state.
Non Competition provisions are usually unenforceable in California. (However, you should check your contract in verifying which state law governs.)
Section 16600 of the California Business and Professions Code reads: �Every contract by which anyone is restrained from engaging in a lawful profession, trade, or business of any kind is to that extent void.�
However, Non-Compete Clauses Are Enforceable in Very Limited Cases.
One �narrow exception� to section 16600 is articulated in section 16601 which reads in certain defined circumstances, persons who sell the goodwill of a business may agree to refrain from carrying on a similar business.� (See Hill, 86 Cal. App. 4th at 901 (citing Monogram Indus., Inc. v. Sar Indus., Inc., 64 Cal App. 3d 692, 698 (1976)). The logic is that �when the goodwill of a business is sold, it would be �unfair� for the seller to engage in competition which diminishes the value of the asset he [or she] sold.�
Should you have any questions, or concerns, please call me at 714.525.5570. I practice business law litigation.
Related Questions & Answers
-
We are company A, and we are hiring a sub-contractor (individual) who will be... Asked 8/07/14, 9:30 am in United States California Business Law
-
I am a defendant in a unlimited civil case. An answer of General Denial was given... Asked 8/06/14, 12:40 pm in United States California Business Law