Legal Question in Business Law in California
Never Received Promised Stock
Hello,
I work for a tech company in Silicon Valley. When hired 5 years ago I was promised stock in 3 years. I never received it they kept stalling. Now I have spoken to an attorney who claims I have a very strong case for my stock. The problem is that the company is going to be sold within the year. So I will have to pay short-term capital gains (35%) instead of long term (15%). Is that difference something that I can win in court? How about the attorney fees are my damages before paying the attorney or after? Or are the damages limited to the stock and ignore the tax and attorney fees.
2 Answers from Attorneys
Re: Never Received Promised Stock
There may be valid reasons for not issuing the stock; you must revisit the promise made you and parse its language (I assume it is in writing, for Heaven's sake!) and figure out what limitations and restrictions are imposed on your unfettered right to claim the stock due to the passage of the three years.
You may indeed be entitled to the stock now, but in my somewhat limited experience with promises of stock, the issuer/employer places many limitations on their generosity, including limits designed to prevent dilution of shares when an acquisition is pending.
The attorney who has been advising you may be right; after all, it's hard to find fault with the opinion of a colleague who has the advantage of meeting with yo personally and perhaps looking at your contract.
Finally, I am not quite ready to agree that your analysis of the tax consequences you face is correct. If your stock ownership is converted from ownership of Corporation X to ownership of Corporation Y as a result of merger, I'd say it's very likely that you won't have a taxable gain at the time of merger. I'm not sure about this, and you should confirm my offhand opinion with a real tax expert.
Re: Never Received Promised Stock
These are all things your attorney can answer for you, and you will obviously need on very soon.