Legal Question in Business Law in California
Verbal contract
I was asked to be part of a construction company with an 33% ownership and my other two partners splitting the rest of the ownership. I began on the 4th of March 2006. We spoke to an attorney about forming an s-corp and the paperwork was sent to the state for official stamping. Sometime between our original agreement of ownwership and our meeting with our attorney my % went down to 24%. I was not ok with that so it caused bad feelings between myself and the majority owner. We both agreed that I depart. I departed on June 19th 2006. We completed several projects in that time and have completed only a certain % of others. What am I legally entitled to as far as a pay out or my % of ownwership and how much time does the company have to pay me out? Thank you for your time!
2 Answers from Attorneys
Re: Verbal contract
Since you did not enter into a binding written agreement, you should receive funds based upon your services rendered adjusted for your capital contribution. A court would award you a reasonable amount. Please call me if you have any other questions.
Re: Verbal contract
The previous answer seems to adopt the theory that there is no contract, and therefore you are entitled to reimbursement for services provided on a theory variously known as "contract implied in law" "implied contract," or "quantum meruit," which is legal Latin for "as much as he deserves." In some factual circumstances, this might be your best approach - for example, if the corporation lost money on the contracts, you might be better off being paid the fair value of your services rather than being treated as a co-owner of 1/3.
However, as the caption to your question suggests, you seem to think there is a verbal contract ("oral contract" is the preferred term), and I would agree.
Your legal problems are (1) to show that it exists; (2) to establish its terms by a perponderance of the evidence, and (3) to money collect damages or otherwise have a satisfactory remedy for its breach.
#1 is probably the easiest. It seems as though your co-promoters don't deny that they made some kind of deal with you. There's probably plenty of eyewitness and written evidence that you were to be a co-owner of this business.
Proving the details (e.g., a 1/3 interest) will be more difficult, and I can't help you with that by remote control, but perhaps you can dig up something other than your word against theirs to tip the balance of the scales in your favor. A court would probably attach importance to the amount of capital you contributed, for example.
Other issues I don't really have time to discuss here are the differences between partnership and corporation law, and the possibility that the business may have been a partnership for a while; whether there is a license; whether you are a director of the corporation; and whether you are legally entitled to be bought out or merely to an increase of your share from 24% to 1/3 (or maybe nothing at all).
Related Questions & Answers
-
Items for sale when a sign says, for sale, $12,000 or best offer, can you hold the... Asked 7/06/06, 10:52 pm in United States California Business Law
-
Rules and Regs at the Workplace Are employers allowed to give a 30 min lunch break... Asked 7/05/06, 10:01 pm in United States California Business Law
-
State of CA violates and breaches lease agreement. We are leasing a industrial... Asked 7/03/06, 8:28 pm in United States California Business Law