Legal Question in Constitutional Law in California

The superior officer seem to have violated the power entrusted to him by asking the subordinate officer to carry out a task usually reserved for servants!

Superior officer therefore should be punished accordingly.

The subordinate officer, while initially correct in not carrying out the task that was clearly out of the scope of his duties, acted inappropriately by hijacking the websites.

The subordinate officer therefore, should be punished accordingly.

There should be a governing body to deal with these matters as it seems things are in a mess.

Mr. Tashjian's answer seems very fair. But the reason you posted your question on this website must be that you wanted to know what the law says about the situation.

You posted under Constitutional Law, a field based on the United States Constitution and on the constitutions of the various states. The rules you describe as a constitution are really just bylaws with a fancy label.

I would need to know more about your club and its bylaws before I could say what laws are really at issue here. I would also need to know whether your college is public or private. But I doubt you really need a formal legal opinion.

Both officers tried to exploit their positions for selfish reasons which had nothing to do with furthering the interests of the club. The second officer's refusal to carry the first officer's luggage doesn't strike me as insubordinate, since the order was way out of line. Hijacking the website in retaliation was even more out of line. They sound like a pair of spoiled children. Why the club stood behind the more senior of the two is beyond me. The only good solution likely would have been to oust both of them, though whether and how that could be done depends on what the club's rules and the college's say about such matters.