Legal Question in Construction Law in California

garage door killed my dog

Our Yorkie was crushed/killed by our

automated garage door. my dog tried

to exit our garage, he was not

detected by the sensor beams that

were mounted too high (7 & 1/2

inches off the floor) & the doors

reversing mechanism was set too

high so the door continued to close

even after it came into contact with

our Yorkie. The garage door crushed

our Yorkie to death! Two years ago

we hired this licensed contractor to

install this new garage door at our

home. The licensed contractor sent

his worker to our home and this

worker didn't install the garage door

correctly. The two sensor beams

should of been installed five inches

from the floor and the reversed

mechanism for the garage door was

set too high so the sensor never

activated into the reverse mode

when it came in contact with my

Yorkie. I contacted this contractor

who came and his worker fixed the

improperly installed garage door but

denied any responsibility for our

Yorkie�s death.

Is the contractor liable for my

$1000.00 Yorkie?


Asked on 1/09/08, 11:47 pm

1 Answer from Attorneys

Bryan Whipple Bryan R. R. Whipple, Attorney at Law

Re: garage door killed my dog

The outcome in Small Claims Court might depend upon "whose say-so" establishes that the 7-1/2" setting was incorrect and negligent, whereas 5" would be proper. If the manufacturer's specifications called for 5" and the contractor had access to that information, you have the beginnings of a case. There are other elements you would have to plead and prove to establish financial responsibility for negligence and the dollar amount of your loss.

It also sounds as though two installation errors were made: one that the "electric eye" sensors were too high, so the dog wasn't detected; the other that the pressure-detection system that reverses the motor upon sensing resistance to closure didn't fire off ven though the door wasn't closed completely, and that this in turn was also due to improper installation.

I think that in order to win, you need very good proof that the installation was contrary to instructions that were in the contractor's possession, or of which he was or should have been aware, as to one or the other, and preferably both, of the installation requirements.

You would also need to argue (1) that the failure to follow the instructions was the cause of the dog's death, and (2) the value of the dog at the time of its death.

Read more
Answered on 1/10/08, 12:45 am


Related Questions & Answers

More Construction Law questions and answers in California