Legal Question in Construction Law in California
garage door killed my dog
Our Yorkie was crushed/killed by our
automated garage door. my dog tried
to exit our garage, he was not
detected by the sensor beams that
were mounted too high (7 & 1/2
inches off the floor) & the doors
reversing mechanism was set too
high so the door continued to close
even after it came into contact with
our Yorkie. The garage door crushed
our Yorkie to death! Two years ago
we hired this licensed contractor to
install this new garage door at our
home. The licensed contractor sent
his worker to our home and this
worker didn't install the garage door
correctly. The two sensor beams
should of been installed five inches
from the floor and the reversed
mechanism for the garage door was
set too high so the sensor never
activated into the reverse mode
when it came in contact with my
Yorkie. I contacted this contractor
who came and his worker fixed the
improperly installed garage door but
denied any responsibility for our
Yorkie�s death.
Is the contractor liable for my
$1000.00 Yorkie?
1 Answer from Attorneys
Re: garage door killed my dog
The outcome in Small Claims Court might depend upon "whose say-so" establishes that the 7-1/2" setting was incorrect and negligent, whereas 5" would be proper. If the manufacturer's specifications called for 5" and the contractor had access to that information, you have the beginnings of a case. There are other elements you would have to plead and prove to establish financial responsibility for negligence and the dollar amount of your loss.
It also sounds as though two installation errors were made: one that the "electric eye" sensors were too high, so the dog wasn't detected; the other that the pressure-detection system that reverses the motor upon sensing resistance to closure didn't fire off ven though the door wasn't closed completely, and that this in turn was also due to improper installation.
I think that in order to win, you need very good proof that the installation was contrary to instructions that were in the contractor's possession, or of which he was or should have been aware, as to one or the other, and preferably both, of the installation requirements.
You would also need to argue (1) that the failure to follow the instructions was the cause of the dog's death, and (2) the value of the dog at the time of its death.