Legal Question in Construction Law in California
I'm a licensed California plumbing contractor, and I installed a toilet for a customer and re-used
the water supply line. the supply line broke over three months after and flooded the house the insurance company is trying to get me to pay for it. How long am I liable if a leak happens and am I liable even
if i did'nt supply the customer with the supply line that broke
1 Answer from Attorneys
I don't bother to keep up on building codes by memory, but the issue would seem to be whether the applicable building codes required you to replace the supply line when you replaced the toilet. If so, you're probably liable. If not, there are two follow up questions - 1. was the supply line in such a condition that you knew or should have known it would fail within a reasonably short period of time; and 2. did anything you did or failed to do in the course of the installation contribute to the failure of the line? If yes to either of those questions, you are probably liable. If you answer no to all three questions AND have at least some proof of your answer, you should not be held liable. In any case, if you have liability insurance you should tender a claim to them. They will sort it out and most likely provide an attorney for you if it goes that far.
Related Questions & Answers
-
'In california - construction law - general contractor - How long, once job is... Asked 11/09/12, 2:45 pm in United States California Construction Law
-
Hi, I'm a contractor and I have a simple question. When do I have to provide the... Asked 11/01/12, 10:02 am in United States California Construction Law