Legal Question in Credit and Debt Law in California

I have a previous case due to a delinquent credit card. But it was filled in 12/27/2011. The last "action text" on it was in 2013. My question is, was my case closed, or can they still serve me/garnish my wages?

Here is what everything says:

09/12/2013 FINAL RETURN TO COURT - WRIT OF EXECUTION AS TO SACRAMENTO COUNTY PARTIALLY FILED. Not Applicable Document

09/10/2013 WRIT OF EXECUTION ISSUED; LOS ANGELES COUNTY Not Applicable

09/06/2013 MEMORANDUM OF CREDITS OF $290.19. Not Applicable Document

09/06/2013 --AND ACCRUED INTEREST OF $290.75 AND COSTS AFTER JUDGMENT IN THE SUM OF $168.00 FILED. Not Applicable

12/27/2012 8:30 AM DEPT. 07 HEARING RE: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE ISSUED AGAINST PLAINTIFF FOR FAILURE TO FILE DEFAULT JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO CRC 3.740. Vacated

05/21/2012 WRIT OF EXECUTION ISSUED; SACRAMENTO COUNTY

05/21/2012 MEMORANDUM OF CREDITS OF $0.00. Not Applicable Document

05/21/2012 --AND ACCRUED INTEREST OF $13.35 AND COSTS AFTER JUDGMENT IN THE SUM OF $25.00 FILED. Not Applicable

05/07/2012 ABSTRACT OF JUDGMENT ISSUED Not Applicable

04/17/2012 JUDGMENT BY DEFAULT BY CLERK FILED 04/17/12 Not Applicable Document

04/04/2012 REQUEST FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT AND CLERK'S JUDGMENT ON THE COMPLAINT (COLLECTION) FILED 12/27/2011 OF NEWPORT CAPITAL RECOVERY GROUPII, LLC AS TO __________ FILED. Not Applicable Document

04/04/2012 REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL OF DOES/ROES ON THE COMPLAINT (COLLECTION) FILED 12/27/2011 OF NEWPORT CAPITAL RECOVERY GROUPII, LLC FILED. Not Applicable Document

04/04/2012 DECLARATION RE COSTS PURSUANT TO C.C.P. 1033 FILED BY NEWPORT CAPITAL RECOVERY GROUPII, LLC Not Applicable Document

04/04/2012 DECLARATION RE ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS FILED Not Applicable Document

02/14/2012 CASE IS REASSIGNED TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE JOHN W VINEYARD IN DEPT. 07 FOR CASE MANAGEMENT PURPOSES. Not Applicable

02/06/2012 PROOF OF SERVICE (SUB-SERVED AND MAILED) ON COMPLAINT (COLLECTION) FILED 12/27/2011 OF NEWPORT CAPITAL RECOVERY GROUPII, LLC AS TO _____; MAILING DATE OF 01/30/12 FILED. Not Applicable Document

12/27/2011 COMPLAINT AND PARTY INFORMATION ENTERED - COLLECTION Not Applicable

12/27/2011 CASE IS ASSIGNED TO DEPARTMENT 12 FOR LAW AND MOTION PURPOSES (COLLECTIONS) Not Applicable

12/27/2011 DIRECTLY ASSIGNED TO DEPARTMENT 07 FOR CASE MANAGEMENT PURPOSES (COLLECTION).

12/27/2011 HEARING RE OSC FOR FAILURE TO FILE DEFAULT JUDGMENT SET 12/27/12 AT 8:30 IN DEPT. 07.

12/27/2011 SUMMONS ISSUED ON COMPLAINT (COLLECTION) FILED 12/27/2011 OF NEWPORT CAPITAL RECOVERY GROUPII, LLC AND FILED. Not Applicable Document

12/27/2011 CERTIFICATE OF COUNSEL FILED. Not Applicable Document

12/27/2011 LIMITED CIVIL-GENERAL CIVIL COMPLAINT FOR COLLECTION UNDER $10,000 CRC 3.740 FILED. (RIVERSIDE) Not Applicable Document Complaint First Page


Asked on 7/28/15, 3:18 pm

1 Answer from Attorneys
Carl Starrett Law Offices of Carl H. Starrett II

The judgment is good for 10 years and they can renew it. So yes, they can still take action to garnish your wages or use other methods to try and collect the judgment.

Read more
Answered on 7/29/15, 5:43 am


Related Questions & Answers

More Credit, Debt and Collections Law questions and answers in California