Legal Question in Criminal Law in California

In 1994, I was working for a fast food restaurant in Fullerton, CA. I stole approximately $2,300. Myself and the other managers were given a polygraph test. I passed but another employee did not. Apparently he confessed to my crime and other thefts. I don't know, but I was told that he eventually entered into some sort of plea agreement (I heard both third hand).

Now I would like to right the situation, if at all possible. But I've been told that reversing the conviction will be impossible due to the plea agreement and due to the age and due to the fact that he confessed to other thefts (which I'm guessing he did commit, which is why he failed the polygraph).

Is there anything that can be done to reverse the conviction and would the statute of limitations apply to my own culpability? (I assume they would normally, but was wondering if there are exceptions that could cause me problems).


Asked on 9/06/09, 6:31 pm

1 Answer from Attorneys
Edward Hoffman Law Offices of Edward A. Hoffman

There may be a way to clear the crime from the other man's record, but only if the court believes you are telling the truth and not just trying to help your former co-worker. Even then, it is quite possible that your confession would accomplish nothing.

I believe the statute of limitations would protect you at this point, but I would need to know more about the facts. Bear in mind that the expiration of the limitations period is one reason why the court might disbelieve you. After all, if you have nothing to lose by taking the blame there is less reason to believe you are telling the truth.

Read more
Answered on 9/08/09, 12:24 am


Related Questions & Answers

More Criminal Law questions and answers in California