Legal Question in Criminal Law in California

druds seized, man arrested by mistaken identity

local police see a vehicle that looks like the one of a murder suspect, as man walks out to get into vehicle,(that was not registered to him) he's held at gunpoint, vehicle searched, drugs(methanphetimines, 1lb), wrapped in a present, and guns siezed, and arrested before even knowing his name or if he even has a search and seizure. Even though he was in a vehicle that had that amount of drugs in it, because the car did not belong to him how can they prove that it was he who was responsible for that and can they supress the evidence because it was an illegal search, wasn't it? How can they pull you out of a car and arrest you before they even know your name?


Asked on 9/24/04, 1:27 am

2 Answers from Attorneys

Michael Stone Law Offices of Michael B. Stone Toll Free 1-855-USE-MIKE

Re: druds seized, man arrested by mistaken identity

Sorry Your Friend had his pound of druds seized along with all his gubs. The story that the car looked like the one of a murder suspect is probably bogus. They probably tapped his phone illegally or someone snitched him off. You can always hire a lawyer to try and beat the search, but it's hard and expensive to do. Wise drud dealers set aside money for good lawers as part of their business plan.

Read more
Answered on 9/24/04, 2:00 am
Edward Hoffman Law Offices of Edward A. Hoffman

Re: druds seized, man arrested by mistaken identity

When police search the wrong house, car, etc. as the result of a reasonable mistake, their actions are legal and the resulting evidence -- even if it turns out to be useful against someone other than the person they were after -- can be used in court.

Police don't need to know someone's name before conducting an arrest, ordering him out of his car, etc. -- especially when he has weapons within reach. If officers needed to know the person's name before they could act, suspects could just keep their mouths shut and force the police to do nothing. Such a rule would serve no useful purpose, but it would needlessly interfere with investigations and would frequently put police in mortal danger.

That your friend did not own the car is beside the point. The question is whether he was in possession of the drugs and the weapons. Possession is not the same thing as ownership, and you can possess items that other people own and/or that are in other people's cars. The fact that your friend had access to the car suggests that he had control over what was inside. Does it prove he is guilty? No, but it is more than enough to support an arrest and even a conviction if the jury is convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that he knew what was in the car.

Read more
Answered on 9/24/04, 2:48 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More Criminal Law questions and answers in California