Legal Question in Criminal Law in California

If a person is convicted of h&s 11378 or h&s 11379 is that person eligible for penal code 1000 (deferred entry of judgment) or proposition 36 under california law?

if a person had a choice between being convicted of h&s 11378 and h&s 11379, which one would be the best choices to be convicted with under california law?


Asked on 7/22/10, 3:50 pm

2 Answers from Attorneys

Joe Dane Law Office of Joe Dane

Possession for sales (11378) is NOT one that is eligible for either PC 1000 or prop 36. 11379 *might* be if it was transportation for personal use. If it's alleged as sales (as in the actual sale), then it's not eligible either.

Which is better? Both carry the same sentencing range, both can be used as priors against you in the future (if convicted of a similar sales offense in the future, the prior can add 3 years) and both have the same immigration and moral turpitude issues.

So - from a legal standpoint, they're the same. If push came to shove, I suppose a generically worded 11379 transportation would be slightly less "bad" sounding, but it depends on what context you're trying to lessen the impact. When divulging to employers or other people you're trying to impress? Possession for sales = drug dealer. Transportation of drugs = either you got caught driving with your dope in your pocket or you're a mule.

Read more
Answered on 7/23/10, 6:32 am
Anthony Roach Law Office of Anthony A. Roach

Neither of those charges would qualify you for the Deferred Entry of Judgment program under Penal Code section 1000. Prop. 36 is usually given for possession for use, and not possession for sale or importation for sale charges.

I don't think either of the two charges are "better" from any standpoint.

Read more
Answered on 7/23/10, 11:02 am


Related Questions & Answers

More Criminal Law questions and answers in California