Legal Question in Criminal Law in California

prison enhancements

on 1/22/2007 the Supreme Court struck down old Calif law on enhancement. (Cunnining vs California ), (Docket #05-6551).I have a friend who has sentance to 21 yrs with 85 %, in whitch 11 yrs are enhancements.The case was pled-bargined.NO jury no trail involved,all enhancement were ruled by a Court of Law,(illegal and unconstitutional)??What is needed to have these Strikes strickened???


Asked on 3/18/07, 10:16 pm

1 Answer from Attorneys

Edward Hoffman Law Offices of Edward A. Hoffman

Re: prison enhancements

It is not clear whether the Cunningham decision applies retroactively. Depending upon how long ago your friend was sentenced, the decision might not entitle him to any relief.

More importantly, it isn't clear that Cunningham applies to sentences which the defendant accepted as part of a plea bargain. A defendant who accepts such a bargain waives a jury, and thus cannot complain that any part of his sentence was decided by the judge. Further, a plea bargain usually involves the defendant admitting to the factual basis for the conviction and for the enhancements to which he is subjected.

I would thus need to know quite a bit more about the case before I could say whether your friend may have a viable claim for relief.

Assuming that Cunningham can help your friend and that it is too late to make the issue part of an appeal, he will need to petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

You and/or your friend should feel free to contact me about his situation.

Read more
Answered on 3/18/07, 10:52 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More Criminal Law questions and answers in California