Legal Question in Family Law in California
California
I owned my house before marriage of 20 years. I hold 80% of the equity as separate property. My wife moved out 18 months ago. She is now asking for fair market value rent of $1800 a month from me, I know she can only get 1/2 which would be $900 a month..
My question is: Since I own 80% of the equity as separate property, is she entitled to 100% of the $900, or just 20% of the $900 as that is what the equity split is??
3 Answers from Attorneys
Actually, since you owned the house since prior to the marriage, she has no right to the rental value after separation. The house is your separate property, less 1/2 the buy in value of the time married relative to the buy down on principle alone during the marriage, over the buy down in principal in the times outside the marriage. As separate property, her rights only extend to he period during the marriage. You really should have a highly qualified family law attorney helping you with this. Good luck!
Mr. Schneider is not QUITE right. Your house is 100% separate property, subject to a community claim for reimbursement. The community is entitled to reimbursement without interest of whatever the community contributed to the value of the property during the marriage, so that includes pay-down of principal, but not interest payments, and includes improvements, such as an addition or remodel, but not maintenance. It gives her no ownership interest at all that would give rise to a claim for rent. In addition, even if the family home was community property, if the spouse who occupies the home prior to distribution of the community assets pays all the expenses of the home, there is a presumption that those expenses are equivalent to the rent owed the community, and therefore it zero's out. Either way she is entitled to nothing in the way of rent.