Legal Question in Family Law in California

Re: Epstein credits

If one is not enjoying the "use" of the property, but it's being rented out, it's just an investment that bears what it bears. So potentially you owe him a share of the profits, as he does you.

Judges have discretion over these issues and results can vary, so my suggestion is get to the finish line sooner than later so that wildcard issues are minimized.

Re: Epstein credits

I agree in part and disagree in part with the advice of Attorney Greene. The Epstein credits are discretionary with the court, but generally should be given. As to the rental properties, each should get credit for any negative cash flow on the rental. As to the time that a property being used by one of you as a residence there may be Epstein credits but most times (I don't know about your case) the Epstein credits are offset by Watts charges, a charge for the rental value of the property. If you do not have an attorney who is experienced in Family law litigation you really need to retain one. You have a lot of value to protect. If you have an attorney who could not answer these questions, you need to seek a new attorney. I do not agree with the advice to rush this to judgment. You must have your entire case prepared to go into a trial. Haste makes waste, is an old saying and applies in preparing for trial. Good Luck, Pat McCrary

Re: Epstein credits

Factors such as disparate income needs to be considered before an opinion may be rendered. Contact me directly.