Legal Question in Family Law in California
in Oct.08 I filed a Stipulation and Order Re:Child Custody,visitation,child support and child support arrears. This stipulations was agreed by both myself and ex-husband.On the conditions stated on this documents it states that if the minor child wishes not to visit with her father,then she has the right and discretion to cancel the visitation at any time.These documents were signed by ex-husband,an attorney and myself it was filed in the Superior Court of Los Angeles.Well my daughter in the month of Dec.told her father that she never wanted to see him again,after an argument where he told her if she were in front of him saying these things he did not know what he would do to her.she felt frightened specially because he has a history of domestic violence.He has stopped paying child support as of May 08 and I filed child support a month or two a go.He hired an attorney and is pursuing for joint custody,and stating I am refusing to the visitations.Claims I am not following my part of our agreement.My question is if he takes me to court,is the agreement which is filed and signed a legal reason to state that in fact it is my daughter who cancelled the visitation and if he is not responsible for child support since the visitation was cancelled.This individual saw his daughter after 8 years,she looked for him.Does he have a good case against me?
2 Answers from Attorneys
Visitation and child support are two separate things. He is still considered to be in arrears on his child support, regardless of the visitation issue. He can fight for joint custody, but it doesn't mean he will get it. Is this history of domestic violence documented? Has he been before the court on domestic violence charges? If you really do feel he poses a danger to your daughter, then I would ask for supervised visitation, but you have undercut your position by not treating the situation seriously and calling the police and having them involved when your daughter felt threatened in 2008.
He has violated the court order if he has not paid child support for the past two years in accordance with the order. Whether you will be considered to have violated his visitation rights is questionable. You say the order says the daughter had the option of not seeing him. Even without that, visitation can be difficult as children get older if they gravitate toward one parent. One parent often accuses the other of keeping the child away, when the reality often it is just a matter of the child simply being tired of being in the middle of two bickering parents and worried about keeping everyone happy. Especially in teen years, life has enough drama.
Ms. Beers answer is correct, but just to clarify: Support is entirely separate from visitation. The other parent can kidnap the child and run off to Iran, and the support obligation continues. As for the child not wanting to visit her father, and your agreement, you got suckered a bit by the attorney father. No court is going to enforce a custody agreement that allows the child to pick and chose when they visit. If a child was mature enough to make those decisions for themselves, there would be no custody proceedings and orders. As a child gets older, the child's wishes are taken more into account, but the law is clear that the court must independently determine what is in the best interests of the minor child as far as custody and visitation. I agree that with the order you have, you are not in contempt for not making her visit him, but given the unenforceable nature of the order, he is entitled to go to court and get a new one. As for what that order will be and whether he will get joint custody, there is no way to even venture a guess here. It will turn on the complete package of evidence that is before the court, and to a large extent what Family Court Services reports after your "mediation."