Legal Question in Family Law in California

You would have to prove actual bias or improper motive. Chances are that had absolutely nothing to do with your outcome. You really think a busy judge in Los Angeles Superior Court, with hundreds of cases on his or her docket, really actually cares enough about favoring your opponent to jeopardize their judicial career by corrupting their evidentiary decisions in favor of your opponent? REALLY? Are they REALLY that important? Really? Your opponent is really that powerful? In L.A.? And it hasn't made the papers? REALLY? The fact of the matter is you foolishly represented yourself and had no idea what you were doing, how to put on a case, or even how to make exhibits admissible under the Evidence Code in a court of law. The judge is REQUIRED to rule against you and refuse to accept the exhibits when you don't present them in accordance with the Evidence Code and relevant state and local rules of court. And if the judge actually thought you were innocent, but was forced to rule against you because there was not ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE in your favor, shouldn't you want the reconsideration in front of that same judge, only this time with proper exhibits and evidence? You really need to face the fact that you are in way over your head in court, you have no idea what you are doing, and you have already messed up your case once. You need to hire a lawyer, or just give up. Without a lawyer you will just get the same results and eventually will get fined for wasting the court's time.