Legal Question in Family Law in California

my wife had a son with her last (maiden) name and not the bio dad. she wants to change her sons last name (from her maiden name ) to her new married name, can she do this? I told her that we can adopt, but she wants the bio dad to pay child support being that he wanted a child, then left. they were never married and is not on the birth certificate. and if she can, is this something she can do by ourself, or do we need an attorney?

Thank you for your help.


Asked on 9/11/11, 9:25 pm

2 Answers from Attorneys

Patricia Vanharen Law Office of Patricia C. Van Haren

She will not be able to obtain child support from the father unless paternity has been established. In order to have the name of the child changed, she will have to file a Petition for a name change. Since both can be tricky matters, it would be best for her to retain an attorney.

Read more
Answered on 9/11/11, 10:12 pm
Anthony Roach Law Office of Anthony A. Roach

A minor has no common law right to change his or her name, but a parent may apply for a change of name on the minor�s behalf. (In re Trower (1968) 260 Cal.App.2d 75, 77.)

A parent petitioning for a name change on behalf of a minor must comply with Code of Civil Procedure section 1276. If the petition is filed by only one parent, the petition shall specify the address of the other parent, if known. (Code of Civ. Proc., � 1276 subd. (c).)

If the non-petitioning parent is living and does not join in consenting to the petition, the petitioning parent must cause the non-petitioning parent to be served with notice 30 days prior to the hearing. (Code of Civ. Proc., � 1277 subd. (a).)

If the non-petitioning parent does not receive actual notice, they may move the court to set aside the decree changing the minor�s name. (In re Malley (1960) 185 Cal.App.2d 135, 137.)

A parent has some legal rights to control a minor�s use of a surname, but a parent�s sex or marital status does not create any primary rights or protectable interest in the minor�s surname. �With the adoption of the California Uniform Parentage Act no longer can it be said that a parent has a primary right or protectible interest in having his or her child bear and maintain that parent�s surname merely because of the parent�s sex and marital status with respect to that child�s other parent at the time the child is born.� (Donald J. v. Evna M. (5th Dist. 1978) 81 Cal.App.3d 929, 936-937.)

In resolving parental disputes over a child�s surname, the court�s sole consideration is the child�s best interest, and a father does not have any primary right to have a child bear his name. (In re Marriage of Schiffman (1980) 28 Cal.3d 640, 645.)

The proceeding may be filed in a parentage action, otherwise the proceeding must conform with the provision of Code of Civil Procedure section 1275 et seq. (In re Stevens (1982) 31 Cal.3d 403, 404.)

Read more
Answered on 9/13/11, 11:06 am


Related Questions & Answers

More Family Law, Divorce, Child Custody and Adoption questions and answers in California