Legal Question in Civil Litigation in California
Thank you for your answers....
When I was served with the complaint, I did not have an attorney, so I filed the answer as best I could, and marked the box "cross complaint" but did not attach a statement. A few weeks later, I found an attorney and told him I wanted to file a cross complaint, but he said it was too late. this was 10 weeks before the trial date.
CCP 426.50 states any time during the course of the action.
Am I missing something..?
It was a bench trial only 2 hours, judge asked if there was a cross complaint.
I said Yes, my attorney said No .... I lost the case, and am trying to appeal in pro per...
could do with some help...
2 Answers from Attorneys
You don't have grounds for appeal for your own failure to file a cross-complaint. Also, if you filed your answer "a few weeks" and then "10 weeks" before the trial, this doesn't sound like a standard civil case. Was this an unlawful detainer? Anyway, the 426.xxx sections only apply to regular civil actions, not special proceedings such as UD. Courts generally disfavor cross-complaints in UD anyway, and the statutes allow only limited grounds for cross-complaints in UD so that tenants can't just automatically file a cross-complaint and drag things out to live rent free.
The good news is that if this was not a regular civil action, whether UD or some other proceeding, the rule that if you don't plead it you lose it doesn't apply either. So if you have a genuine case you can still file it as a separate law suit.
Your attorney may have tried to make a motion to file a cross-complaint late. You should have received credit for any damages awarded against you for any caused by the plaintiff. Contact me directly.
Related Questions & Answers
-
Does small claim court have the power to order an injunction Asked 9/29/09, 7:44 pm in United States California General Civil Litigation