Legal Question in Civil Litigation in California
Civil Procedure
I am an In Pro Per Plaintiff and I filed a Breach of Contract complaint in limited civil court. I was successful in obtaining a motion for summary adjudication; however, I have outdone myself procedurally by not specifically requesting this as an alternative to a summary judgment....my docs only requested summary adjudication...per legal aide the two were synonymous; so I thought........trial date is set less than 75 days out..so my question is whether I should go ex parte request order shortening time to serve and have motion for summary jdgmnt heard or prepare for trial allbeit that the cause of action has already been adjudicated?
3 Answers from Attorneys
Re: Civil Procedure
If there is only a single cause of action and you were successful on your motion for summary adjudication you may still have an issue as to whether you proved up damages in your motion. If damages were proven in your motion then theoretically you can have judgment entered.
If damages were not proven but the cause of action was determined in your favor then I would expect that you would have to prove up your damages with the Court.
You should probably have an attorney review the ruling on the MSAI.
J. Caleb Donner
DONNER & DONNER
LEGAL WARRRIORS�
910 Hampshire Road, Suite R
Westlake Village, CA 91361
email: [email protected]
website: www.legalwarriors.com
DISCLAIMER
This reply constitutes legal information for education purposes and does NOT constitute legal advice nor establish an attorney-client relationship. We will only represent you based on a written retainer agreement. Therefore, you should contact this office to discuss representation if you do want legal advice/representation.
Re: Civil Procedure
It's difficult to give you any direction at this point without reviewing your your case. This is really not the forum for your type of inquiry.
Re: Civil Procedure
If this matter has not been resolved contact me immediately.