Legal Question in Civil Litigation in California
Declaration For Additional Discoveries
A couple of days ago, I sent interrogatories and RFA to a defendant. Since the questions were more than 35, I attached a separate Declaration For Additional Discoveries with the interrogatories and RFA.
On the Declaration for Additional Discoveries for RFA, on 3 places I have not replaced the word ''interrogatories'' with the word ''RFA''. The rest is correct.
Will the defendant who is represented by an attorney make an issue out of this error and refuse to answer the additional questions on RFA or not?
Is it better for me to have the corrected Declaration For Additional Discoveries for RFA served on the defendant with the questions I had sent before and may be a couple of additions?
I appreciate your clarification.
1 Answer from Attorneys
Re: Declaration For Additional Discoveries
It would be a good idea to serve an amended declaration to make it absolutely correct. Why give the other party any leeway to object?!