Legal Question in Civil Litigation in California

Technically (which means some judges don't know this rule) you are not allowed to orally argue if you do not have a written opposition. Some judges refuse to hear oral argument at all, and only want written briefs. I personally think it is foolish to not prepare a written opposition to any motion or petition that you are opposed to.

If you have only filed the complaint and no amendments, you can just file an amended complaint that cures the defects identified in their motions. If you can't cure the defects by amendment, you should file a dismissal before you set yourself up to be sued for abuse of process and malicious prosecution. Without knowing anything about what grounds you have sued these people for, I can still say that there is virtually nothing you can properly sue another person's lawyer for since they have the litigation privilege to protect them and they owe no contractual or other legal duty to you that could be breached to give grounds to sue them. So unless you have a VERY unique situation, you can't do anything but dismiss at least as to the attorneys without setting yourself up to be sued back after they get your case thrown out.

Can I add I believe you need counsel. You are in way over your head.