Legal Question in Civil Litigation in California
Hi,
I am a defendant in pro per in civil case in CA. Had to file a Motion to set aside default judgment, the hearing sheduled in 2 weeks.
Two days ago Writ of Execution was issued and today I recieved Plaintiff's attorneys' Stipulation to set aside default and Order thereon and a Memorandum in Opposition to motion to set aside default Judgment saying "Plaintiff does not oppose setting aside the default and having defendant's proposed Answer be filed within 15 days of signing of this Order by Judge.
I did send them back signed Stipulation and will file my Answer right away after Judge will sign it.
My question is- Should I respond to their Memorandum in Opposition to motion to set aside default? If yes, how should I do it?
Any help will be greatly appreciated!
3 Answers from Attorneys
It does not make sense that they filed an opposition after agreeing to a stipulation. If there is a stipulation then you could rely upon it as them conceding. I don't think it is necessary to reply but if you want to then it would be safer.
I agree that this is not consistent. Without the benefit of seeing the pleadings, I suggest that you might consider a reply that accepts their offer, so that it is clear to the judge.
Nothing contained in this communication is intended to be, or shall be deemed as, legal advice, counsel, or services to on or behalf of any person or any entity. Usage of the LawGuru website is not intended to and shall not create any obligation or relationship between the user and the Law Office of Herb Fox, including but not limited to, an attorney-client relationship. The Law Office of Herb Fox does not and cannot warrant that any communication between the user of this Web site and the Law Office of Herb Fox shall remain confidential. Finally, your situation may be governed by deadlines that may or may not have already lapsed, and you may lose your rights if you do or did not act within those deadlines.
I'm confused by your post. Does their opposition state that they are not opposed to setting aside the default, or is that only in the stipulation?