Legal Question in Civil Litigation in California

You don't clearly state what you want the court to take judicial notice of, but it sounds like it is case law. You cannot ask the court to take judicial notice of law. The court decides the law, including its interpretation of precedent. Judicial notice is a method of getting FACTS into evidence. In a motion for a new trial facts are irrelevant unless you wish to introduce evidence that would change the outcome AND that you could not have presented at trial for some reason. Since judicially noticeable facts must be public records or other facts that are so universally known or unassailable as to be general public knowledge. Therefore nothing that is judicially noticeable could possibly have been unable to be presented at trial.

The case is over, and you lost. This is because you are in pro per and you lacked the legal knowledge and skill to properly present your case. Next time you think have a case, hire an attorney.

Good job representing yourself, and getting into this bind. I hope you saved a lot of money by not speaking a lawyer until after trial was over. Thank you for posting that here, so that others may read it and be warned of the dangers of representing yourself. Keep up the good work, and when you get a chance, do some of your own surgery too. After all, doctors are so expensive.