Legal Question in Civil Litigation in California
If you are serving a subpoena on someone for their testimony and for records/documents. There are times when a notice of consumer has to be sent. If you are asking subpoenaing the person who has the documents, do they have to get that notice, or is that only when a third party is being subpoeaned for someone elses records? Basically, does the person qualify as a "consumer," and entitled to notice when they are the ones with the records, and not someone else?
2 Answers from Attorneys
If you are getting records of a party to the litigtion, from them, you don't need a subpoena at all. In discovery you just send a request for production, and for trial issue a notice to appear with documents. Notice to consumer does not come into it. I am not able to think of any situation off the top of my head where you would subpoena the personal records of a consumer who is not a party to the lawsuit from the consumer themselves. If for some odd reason you need to do that, however, you would not need the notice to consumer.
You use a subpoena to obtain documents from a third party. If the third party has records that belong to a consumer, you must give notice to the consumer. Personal records of a consumer are defined here: http://law.onecle.com/california/civil-procedure/1985.3.html
There is a time frame to issue the subpoena, and copies must be given to the consumer. When you serve the subpoena on the third party, the notice that you gave the consumer must also be served on the third party. The time limits allow the consumer to object to production of their records.
Send me a private e-mail if you have questions.
Related Questions & Answers
-
How can i get a evition off my credit if its an error Asked 9/16/10, 10:38 pm in United States California General Civil Litigation