Legal Question in Civil Litigation in California
Small Claims question
A friend just went to small claims court. She is a liensed property manager and has a written contract with the property owner, who lives in Hawaii. She was told by the judge she could not speak in the owners behalf. She could only answer the questions he asked her. She explained she was acting under statue 116-540 (h) stating a property manager can represent the owner if the following apply: They are a liensed property manager, the property manager has a contract with the owner, and the ower lives out of state. All three apply. The judge said he did not care what she had. Can you give me a staue or a reason how he can over rule this?
2 Answers from Attorneys
Re: Small Claims question
Code of Civil Procedure Sections 116.540(h) and 116.540(i) outline
the procedure for a property manager to appear for an owner. If the court refused
to follow the law, the party could attempt to obtain a writ from an higher court commanding
the court to follow the law. Unless the owner was the defendant, the ruling on the small claims matter itself is not
appealable.
If this is a repeating situation, a conference with the court's presiding judge may be appropriate.
Jed Somit
Jed Somit, Attorney at Law
1440 Broadway - Suite 910
Re: Small Claims question
I am not familliar with the statute you mention, and your citation is not sufficiently complete to let me find it (unless I spend a bit of time on research). However, if the judge disregarded the statute, then your friend has a basis for an appeal. Small claims appeals are actually trials in the Municipal Court; these trials are held de novo (in other words, it's as if the small claims hearing never took place). Because Muni Court judges are typically more experienced and more professional than the part-time judges who often serve on Small Claims courts, your friend might do a lot better on appeal.
Edward Hoffman
Law Offices of Edward A. Hoffman
11620 Wilshire Boulevard, #340