Legal Question in Civil Litigation in California

Subrogation in California

I recently was sued by an insurance company after an accident that ocurred during a test drvie at a car dealer. I couldn't afford a defense because it wasn't enough money . It was limited liablilty for $5500...they found the dealer 20% liable.......I was told that if I wanted to sue the dealer because they never told me I could be held liable I had to do it at the time of the suit even though they were not listed as the plaintiff. Is this so?and if it is what other recourse might I have? I feel that they should be required to tell consumers that their insurance companies may sue them.


Asked on 7/25/07, 6:33 pm

3 Answers from Attorneys
Michael Stone Law Offices of Michael B. Stone Toll Free 1-855-USE-MIKE

Re: Subrogation in California

Too bad you are asking this question after the case is over. Your own auto liability insurance should have covered this loss. If you didn't have auto insurance, well, you shouldn't be driving. If you did have auto insurance, and you told them of the loss (and subsequent lawsuit), and they refused to defend it, see a lawyer.

Read more
Answered on 7/25/07, 6:44 pm
Johm Smith tom's

Re: Subrogation in California

Mr. Stone has it covered. You should not have stuck your head in the sand, and if you didn't you should have contacted an attorney much sooner. The worm is gone.

Read more
Answered on 7/25/07, 8:40 pm
Anthony Roach Law Office of Anthony A. Roach

Re: Subrogation in California

I agree with Mr. Stone. Please do not hire Mr. Nance, as he is not licensed to practice law in California. I have noted this several times in posts on this website, yet for some reason he solicits California clients.

Very truly yours,

Read more
Answered on 7/25/07, 8:52 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More General Civil Litigation questions and answers in California