Legal Question in Civil Litigation in California
I am suing one of my roommates in small claims court for rent that he owes my other roommates and I. He happens to be my cousin . My Aunt who I trust told me that she will pay the money out right if I file a request for dismissal. my roommates are worried that if we file this request for dismissal and she doesn't pay we won't be able to sue them again because we already filed a request for dismissal. Is this true? if a request for dismissal is filled can we open the case back up? i don't care what your personnel opinion is. so if you're just going to tell me not to do it becaues that's not how the system works then don't bother answering. please just let me know if we can reopen the lawsuit. thank you
4 Answers from Attorneys
Have her meet you at the court clerk's office with the cash. When she hands it over, she can watch you file the dismissal. If you both were to sign an agreement, the statute of limitations for bringing suit to enforce it would be four years.
You can re-file if you dismiss the case without prejudice, but not if you dismiss with prejudice. You will still have to make sure you don't miss the statute of limitations.
Your best bet is to do as Mr. Cohen suggests, and meet at the courthouse. You don't need to wait until your hearing date to do so. Instead (or in addition), you may want to sign a settlement agreement. That way either of you can sue the other for violating the agreement even after this case is dismissed.
One final note: You say that you (singular) are suing for money owed to you and to another roommate. You can't do that unless the other roommate assigned his claim to you. As a non-lawyer, you can only represent yourself in court. The other roommate may have to sue separately, since he probably can't join the existing lawsuit at this point.
Good luck.
I agree with Mr. Cohen and Mr. Hoffman. If the case is dismissed "with prejudice" you cannot reopen it or refile, as you ask. If the case is dismissed without prejudice, you could refile it, as long as the original statute of limitations has not run in the meantime.
I agree with all of the advise previously set forth.
BARRY BESSER
www.besserlaw.com