Legal Question in Civil Litigation in California

Now you're beginning to get it. That's why if you plead a 9/11 hijacker signed a contract on 9/12 you can get judicial notice, but only the robosigning scandal is of such common knowledge to be judicially noticeable, not the details. You would have to offer evidence of who the woman is and the other things she signed, before the court would have anything to go on, and that is the antithesis of judicial notice. So it must be put in the pleadings and then proved by admissible evidence at trial or in a motion for summary judgment. In fact, if the complaint did not plead that the person who signed the contract was one of the hijackers, just the name, you probably would not be able to get judicial notice to defeat the complaint. This is both because the names of the hijackers are not universally known and undisputed, and because evidence would be required to show that the person in the pleading with that name is the same person with that name who was a hijacker.