Legal Question in Civil Litigation in California

trial delay and discovery

I have an upcoming civil trial where I am being sued for breach of contract. Is it possible to ask for the trial to be delayed based on the fact taht the plaintiff's counsel failed to provide me with written discovery? In July of 2007, the judge imposed sanctions of the plaintiff for failure to provide the discovery. The atty then provided some but not all of the discovery that was requested. I have spoken with the atty on 3 separate occassions October 2007, Janaury 2008 and February 2008. I asked the atty for the information needed on each occassion. He promised to get back to me, but never has. Can I ask for a delay based on this?[I am in pro per].


Asked on 2/26/08, 9:24 am

3 Answers from Attorneys

Robert F. Cohen Law Office of Robert F. Cohen

Re: trial delay and discovery

No. You should have gone in within 45+5 days and asked for additional sanctions, including dismissal. However, you can file a motion in limine to preclude the plaintiff's use at trial of any documents that were not produced and ordered to be produced, and specify which category of documents (or specific documents, if you know what they are)that the plaintiff should not introduce.

You can also ask that a jury instruction be given about presumptions arising from withholding evidence.

Read more
Answered on 2/26/08, 9:40 am
Joel Selik www.SelikLaw.com

Re: trial delay and discovery

Yes it might be, but you should file a Motion for Terminating Sanctions/Compel

Read more
Answered on 2/26/08, 9:42 am
Edward Hoffman Law Offices of Edward A. Hoffman

Re: trial delay and discovery

You should have brought another motion to compel further responses within 45 days after the plaintiff served the inadequate supplemental responses. Merely asking repeatedly for better answers was not enough. Unless you and he stipulated to waive the due date for a motion to compel, you probably cannot force him to give you what you want. The trial court will not delay the trial in order to give you time to do something you no longer have a right to do.

You may, however, be able to pursuade the court to resolve in your favor before trial the issues to which these answers related. Alternatively, you may be able to get an order barring the other side from introducing the evidence they should have given you earlier. These motions are fairly sophisticated and you should try to get a lawyer's help if at all possible.

Read more
Answered on 2/26/08, 2:37 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More General Civil Litigation questions and answers in California