Legal Question in Civil Litigation in California
Is the following verbage legally binding in a court of law? The following is from a day care provider contract :
LEGAL FEES
The House of Play child Development program requires reimbursement of any
and all legal fees. This includes any situation where the parent chooses to
take the provider to court or the provider must take the parent to court. The
provider's costs due to certified mail correspondence, time spend preparing
for and attending court and any/all costs involved due to provider's absence
from the House of Play shall be the responsibility of the parent.
This statement requires the parent to pay all fees whether or not litigation is warranted by either party. Can a contract specify that one party be responsible for both parties leagal fees regardless of the initiator of action or the outcome of the lawsuit? Is this legally binding in the state of CA.
Thank You
John
3 Answers from Attorneys
The terms are probably binding. There is a provision in California Civil Code section 1717 that addresses this very issue. This section provides that in any contract for attorney fees and costs in a contract cannot be unilateral. That is if the day care can request attorney fees the parent can also request attorney fees. The collection of such fees would require either a court order, after completion of a case, for the payment of the fees, which would be set by the court. It appears that the major purpose of this provision would be to encourage parents to pay the day care costs on time and avoid a lawsuit for breach of contract.
Typically, an attorney fees provision is to provide reimbursement of legal fees/costs to the prevailing party. It would be unfair, for instance, if the daycare was grossly negligent resulting in injury to a child and then the parents were required to pay the daycare's legal fees for defending against a just legal action instead of settling. With prevailing party clauses, there are ways that they more or less inclusive depending on the language used. There are also other provisions that can be included to help reduce litigation risk. By way of example, you can include a clause that requires mediation prior to litigation or else ability to recover attorney fees is waived. Each of these provisions has pros/cons. Additionally, there are nuances to the legal language. If you really want to explore the best ways to contractually reduce litigation risk, consult with an attorney. The proposed provision is problematic.
I read this a little different than the others. This provision in my opinion is intended to apply in situations where due to no fault of their own, the day care provider incurs attorney fees as a 3rd party. For example, in child-custody disputes, family law matters etc. That being said, this provision is vague enough as to call in to question all attorney fees, including the typical "prevailing party" use that Ms. Cowin and Mr. Johnson addressed.
Best,
Bryan
Bryan C. Becker
Becker Attorneys
Innovative Legal Services*
Direct: 619.400.4929
Toll Free: 877.201.8728
Twitter: http://twitter.com/bryanbecker
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/bryan-becker/7/a98/403
*What is so innovative? We think everything, but for starters -- our up-front fixed-fee legal services. To learn more, visit: www.becker-attorneys.com
BECKER NEWS:
Do-It-Yourself Guide: Credit Card Collection Lawsuits
Becker Attorneys has just released a new e-book: Fighting Back --A Step-by-Step Guide to Representing Yourself in a Credit Card Collection Lawsuit. The e-book includes all the forms and templates you need to successfully resolve your case without incurring oppressive attorney fees. The guide is available for $299 and is backed by a ninety (90) day money-back guarantee. Don�t let a Judgment be entered against you by failing to answer the lawsuit!
To request a copy, please contact: [email protected]
New Website
We are excited to launch our new website early next week: www.becker-attorneys.com